Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
STEM
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
Sections
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
STEM

NSF Grant Will Allow Acuna to Study Optimization of Scientific Peer Review Process

Wednesday, August 29, 2018, By Diane Stirling
Share
facultyResearch and CreativeSchool of Information Studies

Deficiencies in the scientific community’s centralized peer review process can impact more than a researcher’s career. Faults in the process can ultimately affect the kinds of scientific discoveries that are made, the distribution of information about findings, the technology innovations that do—or don’t—result and even the economic impact of scientific research work.

head shot

Daniel Acuna

With that premise and a goal and plan to improve the process, School of Information Studies (iSchool) Assistant Professor Daniel Acuna has attracted a $531,339 grant from the National Science Foundation.

For the next three years, he and two co-researchers will determine ways to optimize scientific peer review by creating a better understanding of the factors that affect the process and developing insights and plans to improve it. Acuna is the principal investigator for the project. He is working with co-principal investigators Konrad P. Kording, Penn Integrated Knowledge Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and James A. Evans, director of Knowledge Lab, Professor of Sociology, and Director of the Computational Social Science program at the University of Chicago.

Acuna explains that some researchers have found that the scientific community’s centralized peer review process can be slow and low-quality, while other studies have quantified biases in the process, such as  prejudices against certain ideas and inconsistencies in opinions from different groups of peers. Those deficiencies can delay or shorten the dissemination of important research, he says. Such issues also can have larger effects, and not simply on the careers of scientific researchers. More broadly, those issues can affect the types of research that gets done, thus the direction science takes, plus the emergence of technology innovations and even the impact of scientific research on the economy.

“This grant can help illuminate one of the oldest and perhaps least understood aspects of how modern scientific knowledge is disseminated,” Acuna says. “Several research groups have shown that scientists can be against novel ideas or ideas produced by distant scientific relatives. Moreover, scientists can be inconsistent, judging essentially similar pieces of work wildly differently. These problems percolate into the peer review system and can be exacerbated by its anonymity. We hope to address some of these issues.”

In its scope, the research analyzes factors that affect peer review outcomes and uses those to improve reviewer selection. Ultimately, plans call for the development of software that will help optimize reviewer assignments and evaluate the resulting models. The analysis is being done in the real-world context of a scientific journal, major scientific conferences and massive open, online courses (MOOCs).

In its first phase, the project will quantify problems in bias, variance, timing, and quality of reviews, then identify bias as attributed to author and reviewer (such as age, gender, minority status and visibility and centrality within the field).  The second phase of research consists of assessing techniques to estimate the characteristics of potential reviewers. Then, the study will use that information to propose a review panel that is balanced in terms of reviewer choice, timing and quality of the process. In the last segment, the study will test the techniques that automatically assign reviewers and analyze the output of the process.

  • Author

Diane Stirling

  • Recent
  • Tiffany Xu Named Harry der Boghosian Fellow for 2025-26
    Friday, June 20, 2025, By Julie Sharkey
  • Registration Open for Esports Campus Takeover Hosted by University and Gen.G
    Thursday, June 19, 2025, By Matt Michael
  • 2 Whitman Students Earn Prestigious AWESOME Scholarship
    Tuesday, June 17, 2025, By News Staff
  • WiSE Hosts the 2025 Norma Slepecky Memorial Lecture and Undergraduate Research Prize Award Ceremony
    Friday, June 13, 2025, By News Staff
  • Inaugural Meredith Professor Faculty Fellows Announced
    Friday, June 13, 2025, By Wendy S. Loughlin

More In STEM

WiSE Hosts the 2025 Norma Slepecky Memorial Lecture and Undergraduate Research Prize Award Ceremony

This spring, Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE) held its annual Norma Slepecky Memorial Lecture and Award Ceremony. WiSE was honored to host distinguished guest speaker Joan-Emma Shea, who presented “Self-Assembly of the Tau Protein: Computational Insights Into Neurodegeneration.” Shea…

Endowed Professorship Recognizes Impact of a Professor, Mentor and Advisor

Bao-Ding “Bob” Cheng’s journey to Syracuse University in pursuit of graduate education in the 1960s was long and arduous. He didn’t have the means for air travel, so he voyaged more than 5,000 nautical miles by boat from his home…

Forecasting the Future With Fossils

One of the most critical issues facing the scientific world, no less the future of humanity, is climate change. Unlocking information to help understand and mitigate the impact of a warming planet is a complex puzzle that requires interdisciplinary input…

ECS Professor Pankaj K. Jha Receives NSF Grant to Develop Quantum Technology

Detecting single photons—the smallest unit of light—is crucial for advanced quantum technologies such as optical quantum computing, communication and ultra-sensitive imaging. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) are the most efficient means of detecting single photons and these detectors can count…

Rock Record Illuminates Oxygen History

Several key moments in Earth’s history help us humans answer the question, “How did we get here?” These moments also shed light on the question, “Where are we going?,” offering scientists deeper insight into how organisms adapt to physical and…

Subscribe to SU Today

If you need help with your subscription, contact sunews@syr.edu.

Connect With Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Social Media Directory

For the Media

Find an Expert Follow @SyracuseUNews
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • @SyracuseU
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • Social Media Directory
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Campus Status
  • Syracuse.edu
© 2025 Syracuse University News. All Rights Reserved.