Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • Videos
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Library
    • Research
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • |
  • Alumni
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
Sections
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • |
  • Alumni
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • Videos
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Library
    • Research
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy

Standout Element in Carpenter v. U.S. Decision: Justice Gorsuch’s Dissent

Friday, June 22, 2018, By Daryl Lovell
Share
Digital AgeFourth AmendmentPrivacySupreme Court

On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement need to obtain search warrants to access phone location information.

Lauryn Gouldin is an associate professor of law at the Syracuse University College of Law. Professor Gouldin teaches constitutional criminal procedure, criminal law, evidence, constitutional law, and criminal justice reform.

Gouldin says:

“One interesting aspect of the recent decision in Carpenter v. United States is Justice Gorsuch’s dissent. While many will, no doubt, cast the Carpenter decision as a 5-4 decision narrowing the reach of the Court’s broadly-applied and long-criticized third-party doctrine, close readers will see that the lineup is a bit more complex. For those trying to predict where the justices stand on Fourth Amendment issues going forward, this is better characterized as a 5-3-1 decision with Justice Gorsuch standing alone.

“Although he dissents, Justice Gorsuch repeatedly suggests that he sees government overreaching (and a potential Fourth Amendment violation) in the factual background of the case. He unmistakably criticizes the third-party doctrine, stating, for example, that ‘[c]onsenting to give a third party access to private papers that remain my property is not the same thing as consenting to a search of those papers by the government’ and agreeing with the majority that ‘the rationale of Smith and Miller is wrong.’

“Despite these concerns about the doctrine and about the underlying question, Justice Gorsuch dissents from the majority opinion, ruling against Carpenter on procedural grounds. In Gorsuch’s view, Carpenter failed to assert and develop essential property-based, positive law arguments that Justice Gorsuch suggests might have persuaded him to rule in Carpenter’s favor. (‘In these circumstances, I cannot help but conclude—reluctantly—that Mr. Carpenter forfeited perhaps his most promising line of argument.’) Justice Gorsuch says, explicitly, that it is ‘entirely possible a person’s cell-site data could qualify as his papers or effects under existing law’.”

 

To request interviews or get more information:

Keith Kobland
Media Manager
Division of Communications and Marketing
T 315.443.9038   M 315.415.8095
kkobland@syr.edu

 

Daryl Lovell
Media Relations Manager
Division of Communications and Marketing

T 315.443.1184   M 315.380.0206
dalovell@syr.edu | @DarylLovell

820 Comstock Avenue, Suite 308, Syracuse, NY 13244
news.syr.edu | syracuse.edu

Syracuse University

  • Author

Daryl Lovell

  • Recent
  • ‘Exhibition Interrupted’ to Honor Work of Retiring Professor Anne Munly
    Wednesday, April 21, 2021, By Julie Sharkey
  • Important Update for Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts
    Wednesday, April 21, 2021, By News Staff
  • Intelligence++ Competition Winners Announced
    Wednesday, April 21, 2021, By Cristina Hatem
  • Message from Chancellor Kent Syverud
    Tuesday, April 20, 2021, By News Staff
  • Campus Resources Available for Faculty, Staff and Students
    Monday, April 19, 2021, By News Staff

More In Media, Law & Policy

‘Biden is Considering Overhauling the Supreme Court. That’s Happened During Every Crisis in US Democracy’

  Thomas Keck, professor of political science in the Maxwell School, wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post titled “Biden is considering overhauling the Supreme Court. That’s happened during every crisis in U.S. democracy.” Keck, who serves as the Michael…

‘Putin’s Rules of the Game’

Brian Taylor, professor of political science in the Maxwell School, wrote an op-ed for Foreign Affairs titled “Putin’s Rules of the Game.” Taylor is an expert on Russian politics and recently authored “The Code of Putinism,” published by Oxford University…

‘Should the COVID-19 Vaccine Be Required for the Military?’

Mark Nevitt, associate professor in the College of Law, authored an op-ed for Just Security titled “Should the COVID-19 Vaccine Be Required for the Military?” Nevitt specializes in national security law and previously served as a tactical jet aviator and…

Alumni Provide Support to WAER Students at the NCAA Tournament

When the Syracuse University men’s basketball team ended its NCAA Tournament run last month, it also marked the end of a long season for the student media broadcast team at WAER. Newhouse School of Public Communications seniors Corey Spector, Cooper…

‘Has Marijuana Changed or Have We?’

Dessa Bergen-Cico, professor of public health in the Falk College, authored an op-ed for Syracuse.com titled “Has marijuana changed or have we?” Bergen-Cico is the coordinator of Falk’s addiction studies program and has expertise in addiction, drug use and mental…

Subscribe to SU Today

If you need help with your subscription, contact sunews@syr.edu.

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • @SyracuseU
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • @SUCampus
  • Social Media Directory
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Campus Status
  • Syracuse.edu
© 2021 Syracuse University News. All Rights Reserved.