Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • Videos
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Library
    • Research
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • |
  • Alumni
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
Sections
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • |
  • Alumni
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • Videos
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Library
    • Research
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit

Q&A: Kevin Noble Maillard Explains Supreme Court’s Gay Marriage Decisions

Wednesday, June 26, 2013, By Cyndi Moritz
Share

maillardCollege of Law Professor Kevin Noble Maillard, an expert on family law, explains Wednesday’s U.S. Supreme Court decisions on marriage equality.

Q. Is this a landmark moment for gay rights? In what way?


A. Absolutely. The court’s ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) erases the unequal treatment of gays and lesbians in the right to marriage. Now, there is no special, specific law that singles them out, and they are equally eligible for tax benefits and 1,100 other federal protections for married couples. Most notably, binational couples can now safely have their spouses emigrate to the United States.

Q. The reports are saying that DOMA has been partially struck down. What has been struck down and what was left intact?


A. States do not have to recognize the same sex marriages from other states. For example, a couple that marries in New York cannot move to Alabama and have it recognized there. But the federal government must recognize those marriages validly contracted in the states where same sex marriage is legal. Previously, DOMA prevented that latter recognition.

Q. How did the justices rule on the accompanying Proposition 8 case?


A. The majority ruled that the litigants did not have standing to bring the case before the Supreme Court. The proponents of Prop 8 [defining marriage as the union of a man and woman in California] did not have a direct interest in the outcome, only a generalized interest. Because the State of California no longer defends Prop 8, the suit was brought by ProtectMarriage.com and other supporters. The court’s majority did not view these groups as properly representing the state of California. Since the court ruled that there was no standing, the lower court rulings declaring Prop 8 unconstitutional will stand, and Prop 8 no longer has legal effect in California. In California alone, gay marriage is now legal.

Q. What will be the practical effect of these rulings for gay couples and families?


A. Couples in California now have the equal right to marry because Prop 8 has been defeated. And couples in the states where gay marriage is legal may now receive federal benefits and protections, which means they can enjoy the full right to marriage, and not only a “skim milk” version.

  • Author

Cyndi Moritz

  • Recent
  • IVMF Advisory Board Welcomes New Additions
    Monday, January 18, 2021, By News Staff
  • Syracuse Stage Announces Changes to the 2020/2021 Season
    Sunday, January 17, 2021, By Joanna Penalva
  • Hehnly Lab Awarded $1.2M NIH Grant to Research Critical Tissue Formation
    Sunday, January 17, 2021, By Dan Bernardi
  • Important Information Regarding Proof of Eligibility for and Access to the COVID Vaccine
    Saturday, January 16, 2021, By News Staff
  • COVID-19 Update: Vaccination | Testing | Important Reminders | Zoom Sessions
    Friday, January 15, 2021, By News Staff

More In Uncategorized

Danielle Smith writes “Images of the Capitol Riot Reflect a National Crisis.”

Danielle Smith, professor of African American studies in the College of Arts and Sciences and Director of the Renée Crown University Honors Program, wrote an op-ed for History News Network titled “Images of the Capitol Riot Reflect a National Crisis.”…

“Syracuse University Leads City-Wide Tutoring Effort Amid COVID-19.”

Brice Nordquist, associate professor and Dean’s Professor of Community Engagement in the College of Arts and Sciences, was interviewed by WYSR TV for the story “Syracuse University Leads City-Wide Tutoring Effort Amid COVID-19.” Nordquist, who studies the intersections of literacy…

Syracuse Views Fall 2020

We want to know how you experience Syracuse University. Take a photo and share it with us. We select photos from a variety of sources. Submit photos of your University experience using #SyracuseU on social media, fill out a submission…

2022 Senior Class Marshal Application Now Open

A prestigious honor bestowed upon two seniors each year, the Division of Enrollment and the Student Experience is actively seeking applications and nominations for the Class of 2022 senior class marshals. The deadline to apply is Sunday, Jan. 31. “Our…

Nina Kohn’s research featured in “Britney Spears’ conservatorship can be both totally legal and quite bad for her. Many are.”

The research of Nina Kohn, the David M. Levy Professor of Law and Faculty Director of Online Education in the College of Law, was cited in the NBC News opinion piece “Britney Spears’ conservatorship can be both totally legal and…

Subscribe to SU Today

If you need help with your subscription, contact sunews@syr.edu.

Connect With Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Social Media Directory

For the Media

Find an Expert Follow @SyracuseUNews
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • @SyracuseU
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • @SUCampus
  • Social Media Directory
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Campus Status
  • Syracuse.edu
© 2021 Syracuse University News. All Rights Reserved.