Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
Sections
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy

Prof. Grant Reeher on the presidential debate: Game on!

Thursday, October 4, 2012, By News Staff
Share
facultyMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs

Grant Reeher, professor of political science and director of the Campbell Public Affairs Institute in the Maxwell School, shared his reaction to the first presidential debate held Wednesday, Oct. 3, in Denver:

reeherThe bottom line from the debate is Game On.

The bar for Mitt Romney going in was to provide a plausible and reasonable alternative to an Obama second term, and he cleared that. He demonstrated command of the issues he wanted to push, was well-spoken and confident, and in fact for most of the evening took the fight to the president. And in addition to the effective use of talking points, he also demonstrated at times some nuance—for example, he dealt with his passage of the Massachusetts health care reform versus his criticism of the Affordable Care Act in an effective way. He also came across as more moderate, personable and engaging than he has seemed in the past.

President Obama’s performance was not bad, but he was more passive, and tended to take the role of responder, offering policy rebuttals and at times calling for more details about the alternatives being suggested by his challenger. He often let Romney have the last word and seemed content to let critiques go unchallenged when I thought a response or even a correction was in order. At other times he seemed somewhat irritated by Romney’s longer attacks, but strong counterthrusts were not forthcoming. Though he did not look at his watch as did George H. W. Bush in 1992, I nonetheless got the sense as a viewer that he really didn’t want to be there, while Romney seemed to relish the opportunity to make his case.

As far as the debate format itself, the open-ended structure was great if you’re someone who follows the campaign relatively closely. It provided a lot of substance and showcased the differences between their views and approaches, but it also placed a high demand on the voter to follow along and listen closely, as the candidates pivoted off the questions and each other’s statements to engage a wide range of topics under a single ostensible theme. At times this openendedness also encouraged the repetition of talking points.

More specifically on the content as it related to jobs and economy, I continue to be struck by the almost complete absence of any consideration of the nation’s poor. When one in six Americans—and one in four children—live below the poverty line, the exclusive focus on the middle class is worth noting.

On the whole, I’d say this was a good, substantive debate, which yielded a very good night for Mitt Romney. Prior to last night, the president was beginning to coast to the finish line. I suspect that will now change—it will be a more competitive contest from here to the end. Also look for a different performance by the president in round two.

  • Author
  • Faculty Experts

News Staff

  • Grant Reeher

  • Recent
  • Empowering Learners With Personalized Microcredentials, Stackable Badges
    Thursday, July 3, 2025, By Hope Alvarez
  • WISE Women’s Business Center Awarded Grant From Empire State Development, Celebrates Entrepreneur of the Year Award
    Thursday, July 3, 2025, By Dawn McWilliams
  • Rose Tardiff ’15: Sparking Innovation With Data, Mapping and More
    Thursday, July 3, 2025, By News Staff
  • Paulo De Miranda G’00 Received ‘Much More Than a Formal Education’ From Maxwell
    Thursday, July 3, 2025, By Jessica Youngman
  • Law Professor Receives 2025 Onondaga County NAACP Freedom Fund Award
    Thursday, July 3, 2025, By Robert Conrad

More In Media, Law & Policy

Professor Nina Kohn Serves as Reporter for Two Uniform Acts

College of Law Distinguished Professor Nina Kohn is helping to create “gold standard” legislation on some of the most important issues facing older adults and individuals with cognitive disabilities. Based on her legal expertise, including in the area of elder…

250 Years Later, Declaration of Independence Still Challenges, Inspires a Nation: A Conversation With Professor Carol Faulkner

In June 1776, from a rented room in Philadelphia, Thomas Jefferson penned the first draft of the document that would forge a nation. The stakes were high, amidst the ongoing war with the British, to find the right words to…

Philanthropy Driven by Passion, Potential and Purpose

Ken Pontarelli ’92 credits the University for changing his life, opening up opportunities to pursue his passions and achieve professional success that allows him to focus on the public good. In return, he and his wife, Tracey, are paying it…

First-Year Law Student to First-Year Dean: Lau Combines Law and Business to Continue College of Law’s Upward Trajectory

Three decades ago, Terence J. Lau L’98 walked the corridors as an eager student in the College of Law, then located in White Hall. He knew he had been given a rare chance—and a full scholarship—to be a part of…

Ian ’90 and Noah Eagle ’19 Share a Love of Sportscasting and Storytelling (Podcast)

There’s a new father-son sportscasting team on the national scene, one with a decidedly Orange background: Ian ’90 and Noah Eagle ’19. Ian finished his second year as the lead announcer for the NCAA men’s basketball tournament and has crafted…

Subscribe to SU Today

If you need help with your subscription, contact sunews@syr.edu.

Connect With Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Social Media Directory

For the Media

Find an Expert Follow @SyracuseUNews
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • @SyracuseU
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • Social Media Directory
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Campus Status
  • Syracuse.edu
© 2025 Syracuse University News. All Rights Reserved.