Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
Sections
  • All News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business & Economy
  • Campus & Community
  • Health & Society
  • Media, Law & Policy
  • STEM
  • Veterans
  • University Statements
  • Syracuse University Impact
  • |
  • The Peel
  • Athletics
  • Home
  • About
  • Faculty Experts
  • For The Media
  • ’Cuse Conversations Podcast
  • Topics
    • Alumni
    • Events
    • Faculty
    • Students
    • All Topics
  • Contact
  • Submit
Media, Law & Policy

Prof. Grant Reeher on the presidential debate: Game on!

Thursday, October 4, 2012, By News Staff
Share
facultyMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs

Grant Reeher, professor of political science and director of the Campbell Public Affairs Institute in the Maxwell School, shared his reaction to the first presidential debate held Wednesday, Oct. 3, in Denver:

reeherThe bottom line from the debate is Game On.

The bar for Mitt Romney going in was to provide a plausible and reasonable alternative to an Obama second term, and he cleared that. He demonstrated command of the issues he wanted to push, was well-spoken and confident, and in fact for most of the evening took the fight to the president. And in addition to the effective use of talking points, he also demonstrated at times some nuance—for example, he dealt with his passage of the Massachusetts health care reform versus his criticism of the Affordable Care Act in an effective way. He also came across as more moderate, personable and engaging than he has seemed in the past.

President Obama’s performance was not bad, but he was more passive, and tended to take the role of responder, offering policy rebuttals and at times calling for more details about the alternatives being suggested by his challenger. He often let Romney have the last word and seemed content to let critiques go unchallenged when I thought a response or even a correction was in order. At other times he seemed somewhat irritated by Romney’s longer attacks, but strong counterthrusts were not forthcoming. Though he did not look at his watch as did George H. W. Bush in 1992, I nonetheless got the sense as a viewer that he really didn’t want to be there, while Romney seemed to relish the opportunity to make his case.

As far as the debate format itself, the open-ended structure was great if you’re someone who follows the campaign relatively closely. It provided a lot of substance and showcased the differences between their views and approaches, but it also placed a high demand on the voter to follow along and listen closely, as the candidates pivoted off the questions and each other’s statements to engage a wide range of topics under a single ostensible theme. At times this openendedness also encouraged the repetition of talking points.

More specifically on the content as it related to jobs and economy, I continue to be struck by the almost complete absence of any consideration of the nation’s poor. When one in six Americans—and one in four children—live below the poverty line, the exclusive focus on the middle class is worth noting.

On the whole, I’d say this was a good, substantive debate, which yielded a very good night for Mitt Romney. Prior to last night, the president was beginning to coast to the finish line. I suspect that will now change—it will be a more competitive contest from here to the end. Also look for a different performance by the president in round two.

  • Author
  • Faculty Experts

News Staff

  • Grant Reeher

  • Recent
  • Newhouse Creative Advertising Students Win Big at Sports and Entertainment Clios
    Friday, May 30, 2025, By News Staff
  • Syracuse University Libraries’ Information Literacy Scholars Produce Information Literacy Collab Journal
    Thursday, May 29, 2025, By Cristina Hatem
  • Syracuse Pride on Display: Limited-Edition Poster Supports Future Generations
    Thursday, May 29, 2025, By News Staff
  • Timur Hammond’s ‘Placing Islam’ Receives Journal’s Honorable Mention
    Tuesday, May 27, 2025, By News Staff
  • Syracuse University, Lockerbie Academy Reimagine Partnership, Strengthen Bond
    Friday, May 23, 2025, By News Staff

More In Media, Law & Policy

Newhouse Creative Advertising Students Win Big at Sports and Entertainment Clios

For the first time ever, Newhouse creative advertising students entered the Sports Clios and Entertainment Clios competitions and won big. Clios are regarded as some of the hardest awards for creative advertising students to win. At the New York City…

Memorial Fund Honors Remarkable Journalism Career, Supports Students Involved With IDJC

Maxwell School alumna Denise Kalette ’68 got her first byline at age 12, under a poem titled “The Poor Taxpayer” that she submitted to her local newspaper. In a few paragraphs of playful prose, she drew attention to an issue…

New Maymester Program Allows Student-Athletes to Develop ‘Democracy Playbook’

Fourteen student-athletes will experience Washington, D.C., next week as part of a new Maymester program hosted by the Syracuse University Institute for Democracy, Journalism and Citizenship (IDJC). The one-week program, Democracy Playbook: DC Media and Civics Immersion for Student-Athletes, will…

Advance Local, Newhouse School Launch Investigative Reporting Fellowship Program

A new collaboration with Advance Local will provide Newhouse School journalism students opportunities to write and report on investigative projects with local impact for newsrooms across the country. The David Newhouse Investigative Reporting Fellowship program, which launched this year in…

Lauren Woodard Honored for Forthcoming Book on Migration Along Russia-China Border

Lauren Woodard, assistant professor of anthropology, has received the Spring 2025 Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) First Book Subvention for her upcoming book on Russia’s migration policies on the Russia-China border. Woodard’s book is titled “Ambiguous…

Subscribe to SU Today

If you need help with your subscription, contact sunews@syr.edu.

Connect With Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
Social Media Directory

For the Media

Find an Expert Follow @SyracuseUNews
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • @SyracuseU
  • @SyracuseUNews
  • Social Media Directory
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Campus Status
  • Syracuse.edu
© 2025 Syracuse University News. All Rights Reserved.